Monday, 26 June 2017

M27: Her Royal Majesty the Dumbbell Nebula

M27 is the brightest of the so-called planetary nebulae in the sky. The classification "planetary" was derived from the fact that these nebulae often appear like little disks, much like a planet. In reality they're huge shells of gas that were expelled by a dying star.

Right at first glance it's obvious where this particular nebula got its "dumbbell" nickname from, isn't it? Actually, we see this nebula from its equatorial plane. When viewed from its poles it would probably appear ring-shaped, much like the Ring Nebula in Lyra. As I've explained before, it's best to imagine these older, more developed planetary nebulae as an apple without a core. In this case the bright, inner gas shells that were expelled during the collapse of the central star, have caught up with the thinner external shell that already formed before the star exhaled its dying breath. Together they're expanding at 31km/s until they'll dissolve into space. The age estimates vary greatly, between 4,000 and 15,000 years, but the most recent spectroscopic analysis suggests an age of somewhere in between: 9,800 years. There's also been a lot of controversy regarding the Dumbbell’s distance but 1,300 light-years seems to be the most recent consensus. From this distance, the nebula’s a full light-year across.

In order to find the reason why this nebula became so big and bright, we have to examine its central star which is already visible in small telescopes. This star used to be a giant containing as much as ten solar masses. It was big, but not quite big enough to explode as a supernova. Even now, the dying stellar core has a diameter of 70,000km and it still contains 60% of our Sun’s mass, making it the biggest white dwarf known. With an extremely hot surface temperature of 85,000°C, it heats up the vast gas clouds so much that they start to emit a bluish-green light.

Today, the Dumbbell’s one of the brightest and most popular objects in the northern skies, extending almost half of the diameter of a full Moon and easily visible through a pair of binoculars. It’s a privilege to be able to observe it with an 18” binoscope under a reasonably dark sky.

Thursday, 22 June 2017

A difficult name doesn't necessarily mean a difficult object



When I was a kid, I had this big poster of the stars above my bed. It was my perennial source of inspiration and I was constantly scanning it in search for new objects. Being the proud owner of a modest 60mm refractor, which nevertheless was considered a medium-type telescope at the time, I knew that I didn’t have to put the more daring objects on my observing list. So I stuck to the classic Messiers and I felt proud to have seen a great many of them. But on the chart there were also other objects, which had the scary “NGC” denominator, followed by a four-digit number. At first I sort of neglected them in the knowledge that they would turn out to be invisible in my telescope. Also my friends at the Antwerp observatory talked with great apprehension about the NGCs and so I never even bothered to try them, apart from those which I didn’t know were NGCs such as the Double Cluster in Perseus, which is already visible to the naked eye. 

And still... there was one that fascinated me. Right at the heart of my stellar map, near the celestial North Pole, there was this tiny little nebula denominated NGC6543. Was it the number that sounded like a countdown? I don’t know what it was exactly that eventually pushed me to give it a try, regardless of its so-called impossibility status. Surprisingly I didn’t have to look very long in order to find it. Yes, it was small, very small in my humble telescope, but it was unmistakingly there and quite bright too! The next Saturday I couldn’t wait to go back to the observatory to tell all of my astronomy-friends about my observation and for many years to come I felt so proud of this achievement. It was the start of my unstoppable passion for the real faint fuzzies, the ones which others deem impossible, the weird ones, the never-heard-of ones. Many of those reveal themselves to be extremely difficult indeed. Others, like exotic NGC6543 in my 60mm scope, turn out to be remarkably easy. 

Take this little bugger for example. It carries the name Merrill 1-1 (or Me 1-1 in short) after its discoverer. I have to admit that I only came across this one by accident and I suppose that only freaks will know about its existence. But when I pointed my binoscope at it, it appeared surprisingly bright. Yes, it’s tiny and I advise you to use an OIII filter when trying to locate it because in small telescopes or at low power it will look almost stellar. But once you’ve found it, try to push magnifications as much as you can and perhaps this little planetary nebula will reveal as much to you as it did to me. At first glance it’s just a tiny patch and not very interesting as such. But the reason why it’s so small is because it lies incredibly far away from us: 19,000 light-years if you please! Imagine that! This almost certainly means that at the time of writing this planetary nebula won’t be there anymore. It will have completely dissolved into space! It’s just that the light from it being blown up and scattered hasn’t reached us yet. 

Another puzzling thing to which scientists have only recently found the answer is its central star (which was completely invisible to me by the way). This central star’s quite cold with a surface temperature of only 4,300°C (against e.g. 5,500°C for our Sun) and therefore it remained a mystery how such a cold star could heat up the nebula enough for it to emit light. The central star’s also displaced a great distance from the nebula’s centre, by over 10 times the distance to Pluto. A spectroscopic analysis in 2008 revealed, however, that this star isn’t the cause but that a small companion star is. It is a double star, very much like Ras Algethi, the smaller member of which died and released its atmosphere into space.

From our point of view, we see this nebula edge-on and it’s supposed to have a ring-like shape when seen top-down. All that I could see was an elongated sort of box, but what struck me in particular were two cavities on opposite sides. I don’t know if I’ve observed this correctly since it was so small, so any confirmation would be greatly appreciated.    

 

Wednesday, 21 June 2017

Aquila's double cluster (part 2)


About half a degree to the west of NGC6756 lies this open cluster, called NGC6755. Both are definitely one of these very rare "real" double clusters, i.e. which share the same origin. They lie more or less at the same distance (5,000 lightyears) and are just as young (only 8 million years old). Intrinsically they look very similar i.e. most of the stars in both clusters are more or less of the same brightness. But that's where the likeness ends because NGC6755's a lot bigger and richer (80 confirmed members against 40 or so for NGC6756). Then again, NGC6756's a lot more compact and appears more like a faint globular in small to medium telescopes or at low power. For its bigger companion I obviously used lower power in order to fit all of it nicely in the field of view.

Another thing that struck me during my observation, was that NGC6755 appeared somewhat split in two. After doing some research there does seem to be a dark dustlane blocking the light of some of the stars, cutting across the field from top-right to bottom-left. 

Again I must warn you that appearances may be quite deceptive. Stars that seem to belong together from our point of view may be hundreds or even thousands of lightyears apart. The orangy star on the right, for example, is very old and most certainly isn't part of the cluster. The same goes for the somewhat yellowish star below the centre of the field. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any distance data for these two stars, but I can confirm that the bright star near the top-left edge is a giant that lies a thousand lightyears further away from us. 

 

Tuesday, 20 June 2017

Aquila's double cluster (part 1)

Stars are born together in huge clouds of gas, sometimes by the hundreds such as in the Orion nebula. These young and hot stars burn fast and live a wild life, like adolescents, emitting violent radiation which not only illuminates the gas cloud from which they were born, but makes it emit light as well. Eventually the compound radiation from all these young stars will blow the nebula to pieces and the gas disperses into space, leaving only a cluster of stars. Scientists estimate that only 10% of the original gas cloud condenses into stars and that the rest blows away into space, possibly to coagulate into a nebula again when there's enough matter around to let gravity do its work. 

This little gem, denominated NGC6756, is a cluster of young stars in the constellation of Aquila, the eagle, not more than 8 million years old. It lies 5,000 lightyears away and so it isn't the brightest of objects. Actually, the brighter foreground stars, the brightest of which is of magnitude 11,9,  don't belong to the cluster at all but are dwelling much closer to us. The stars of this cluster are therefore quite faint, from mag. 14 down to mag. 18, and are difficult to resolve in smaller telescopes, also because the cluster's still fairly compact. Yet, this makes this particular cluster such an interesting object because even if it doesn't look stellar in a small instrument, it will appear as an attractive nebulous patch. With the binoscope however I had no trouble at all identifying all 40 or so members.

The most interesting thing about this little cluster is that it's one half of a rare double cluster. Although we've identified well over 1,100 of these star clusters in our Milky Way, only a handful of them are double, meaning that two separate clusters share the same origin. The most famous of those if of course the Double Cluster in Perseus, but also NGC1807-1817 in Taurus are two clusters born from the same cloud. As with most clusters, the stars of NGC6756 will eventually drift apart under the pull of our galaxy and most of them will lead solitary lives.

 

Wednesday, 14 June 2017

Very old, but still alive and kicking

Globular clusters are among the oldest entities in the universe. These strange and extremely dense balls of stars are generally older than the galaxies they accompany and some have emerged only just after the Big Bang. With "just" I intend hundreds of millions of years of course. At first sight they all seem alike, but when you take a closer look you'll notice that they're surprisingly different from one another. Take extremely compact M15, for example, and compare it to majestically large and irregular M5. There's NGC2419, so far away that it only marginally feels the gravitational pull of our Milky Way and NGC5466 that's literally torn to bits by it.  There are 150 to 160 of these globulars known to orbit our Milky Way but other galaxies such as giant M87 dominate over 12,000 of them!

And then there are the survivors, the oldest of them all. NGC6426 is, with a distance of almost 70,000 lightyears, quite far away from us. It's so far that you need a sizeable telescope and a good-quality sky in order to resolve some stars in it. Yet, it's a very interesting globular cluster because it's one of the oldest there is. We can tell because this cluster has an unusually low metal content. With "metal" astronomers mean everything heavier than hydrogen or helium. When the universe came to be 13.7 billion years ago, the first chemical element that arose was hydrogen of course, quickly followed by helium which was created through the fusion of hydrogen in the very first stars. But for anything heavier, we had to wait until these first stars ran out of hydrogen and started fusing helium into more complex elements such as carbon, nitrogen and oxygen. This took hundreds of millions to even billions of years. The stars in globular clusters, on the other hand, are extremely slow burners and although very old most of them are still in their hydrogen-fusing phase. The fact that the stars of NGC6426 contain such an extremely low level of "metals" indicates that this cluster was formed very early in the evolution of our Universe.  


Tuesday, 13 June 2017

Two old Suns

Next time you're observing the Turtle nebula in Hercules' belly, point your telescope slightly to the south and you'll bump into this lovely pair. STF2094 is a couple of greenish-yellow giant stars over 500 lightyears away. The term "giant" seems somewhat overrated at first sight since the biggest of the two's just 3,8 times the diameter of our Sun and contains only 1,3 solar masses. The giant classification in this case doesn't concern the star's mass or diameter, but rather its luminosity and the phase of stellar evolution. Originally these stars were not much unlike our Sun and they used to be much dimmer too. Then, suddenly, they ran out of hydrogen and it's exactly the change into a helium-fusing red giant that we're witnessing here, something that will also happen to our Sun in over 5 billion years. The transition into a cool, red giant isn't instantaneous and initially the star in question will not only brighten but also heat up slightly. The surface temperature of the two stars on my sketch measures almost 1.000°C hotter than our Sun. A famous example of a star in this phase of evolution is Capella, the brightest star of the winter constellation of Auriga and the sixth brightest star in our sky. When the star expands further, its surface will gradually cool down and the star becomes an old, red giant. 

The couple on my sketch is therefore quite interesting because they used to be so similar to our Sun and because they seem so close to one another. Well, you have to interpret the word "close" in astronomical terms because in reality these two stars are 171 times the distance between the Earth and the Sun apart, or almost six times the distance to Pluto! And yet, even from this distance, these stars would appear hundreds of times brighter than a full Moon to each other!

This double star represents a bit of a challenge for small to medium telescopes and you need a good-quality sky in order to separate them. Then again, that's precisely what double star fanatics are looking for or course. 

But... wait a minute! Before you go, focus on the upper-right corner of the field of view. Isn't there... something... ? Yes! The faint patch you may notice is a spiral galaxy (catalogued as UGC10525), quite similar to our Milky Way, but very distant. It lies 430 million lightyears away...

 

Monday, 12 June 2017

The Phantom Streak

In a recent post, I showed you an image of a dying star. Fusion of helium into heavier elements such as oxygen and carbon became critically unstable and the star collapsed under its own gravity, blowing away its entire atmosphere in the process. The expelled gas cloud's not become a so-called planetary nebula yet i this case because it isn't emitting light on its own. For this we have to fast-forward one or two thousand years until the remaining, super-hot nucleus of the dead star heats up the expanding gas bubble so much that it ionises. This is exactly what I'd like to show you here. NGC6741, aka the "Phantom Streak" nebula in Aquila, is an extremely young planetary, just marginally older than the Footprint of my former post. The difference is that the Phantom Streak has begun to emit light on its own and therefore it truly deserves to be categorised as a planetary nebula, whereas the Footprint isn't quite there yet. Being so young the Phantom Streak's incredibly tiny and needs a lot of telescope power to be recognisable as a nebula and not a star. On my sketch you can clearly see the tiny gas envelope with its rectangular shape. As I've explained before, stars are less dense at the poles, allowing the gas to escape more easily there. For this reason planetary nebulae often take on an elongated or even cylindrical shape such as the famous Ring nebula. If you look at the Saturn nebula, you'll also note the highly elongated internal structure. 

So how did planetary nebulae come by their "planetary" nickname you might ask? Yes, they got it because they usually do display a round, sort of planetary shape. This outer sphere, however, was already expelled earlier, thousands of years before the star exhaled its dying breath. Stars close to the end of their life swell significantly and become unstable. They grow under the pressure of the complex fusion process in their core until they reach the point that they've become too big and cool down. Gravity takes over and the star contracts again, heating up the star's surface until fusion shifts to a higher gear, and so on. In this unstable period the star already loses a large part of its atmosphere. Sometimes a very big star may lose so much of it that what remains contracts up to the point that fusion becomes stable again and the star's surface may even become extremely hot. The Thor's Helmet nebula is such an example, a giant star that's got rid of a large part of its atmosphere that's being hurled into space under the fierce radiation of the remaining very hot star. Eventually, in the case of a normal planetary nebula, the gas bubble that's expelled by the sudden death of the central star will catch up with the external gas shell and they'll dissolve into space together. 

As regards to our Phantom Streak, the external shell isn't visible to amateur telescopes for the time being since it hasn't been heated up sufficiently. But in another one to two thousand years it will look very much like the Saturn nebula or similar planetaries.